the fast, easy way for students to find great academic information resources.

Argumentative Essays on Cameras in the Courtroom

The controversy over whether cameras should be allowed in the courtroom is ongoing and shows no signs of abating. In fact, it first became an issue in the 1930s with the trial of Bruno Richard Hauptmann but several other highly publicized trials since that time have made sure the issue stays in the public consciousness.  Argumentative essays on cameras in the courtroom examine this issue in depth while looking at both the pros and the cons of having cameras in the courtroom.

Argumentative essays on cameras in the courtroom should begin with a brief history of the issue, noting that the controversy began with the Bruno Hauptmann kidnapping and murder trial in which there was a barrage of flashbulbs and newsreel cameras that sensationalized and disrupted the trial. Next, argumentative essays on cameras in the courtroom should outline the arguments raised both for and against using cameras in the courtroom.  Issues such as freedom of speech, the public right for information, the distraction and and prejudice caused by cameras in the courtroom, and privacy issues of defendants, victims, witnesses, and jurors should be addressed. A good example of a televised trial that reflects the issues regarding cameras in the courtroom should be provided and analyzed in  argumentative essays on cameras in the courtroom as well.  One such example is the program "Judge Wapner and The People’s Court". The TV program lasted from 1981 to 1993 and featured hearings of actual cases by retired judge Joseph A Wapner of California Supreme Court.    The position taken by the American Bar Association, the Federal Judicial Center and the Judicial Conference of the United States regarding the use of cameras in the courtroom should also be related in argumentative essays on cameras in the courtroom. Lastly, argumentative essays on cameras in the courtroom should present court rulings on cameras in the courtroom in specific cases such as "Rideau vs. the State of Louisiana", "Billie Sol Estes vs. the State of Texas", "Nixon vs. Warner Communications" and "The United States vs. Mitchell".

Writing argumentative essays on cameras in the courtroom requires a great deal of effort and research.  You can get help with this task by finding reliable sources on cameras in the courtroom and by reading examples of argumentative essays on cameras in the courtroom.   Also, reading up on proofreading tips, how to write a good introduction or even reviewing basic essay structure can help you write a better argumentative essay on cameras in the courtroom.